Climate change could already be costing NSW billions: new report
2026-06-10T09:00:00+10:00
Photo: Adobe Stock
Research commissioned from 91色情片 suggests climate change was reducing NSW economic output by an average of $21,288 per person in 2024.
New data modelling by 91色情片 Sydney鈥檚 Dr Timothy Neal 鈥 commissioned and released today by the 鈥 suggests just 1.2 degrees of global warming has already shaved between 4% and 33% off the state's economic output.
鈥淢ost economic models of climate change look forward 鈥撀爐owards potential impacts of different warming scenarios in 2050 or even 2100,鈥 Dr Neal says.
鈥淚nstead, we used the same type of models to ask how much richer we would be today if the CO2聽created by human activity didn鈥檛 make the planet warmer,鈥 he says.
鈥淚n this way, we consider a hypothetical reality without anthropogenic warming.鈥
Dr Neal modelled real weather and temperature records from 1975 to 2024 across the world against economic growth.
He then compared the historical data with a 鈥渃ounterfactual鈥 cooler world, where greenhouse gases from human activity did not drive climate change.
鈥淭here are still hot years and cold years, floods and droughts in our counterfactual climate,鈥 says Dr Neal, who is a Scientia Senior Lecturer in the School of Economics and the 91色情片 Institute for Climate Risk & Response.
鈥淲hat disappears in the counterfactual is the long, upward trend in temperature driven by greenhouse gases.鈥
He says this shows how a small difference in annual growth in our hotter reality can compound into large differences in living standards over time.
鈥淭he gap between the real economy and the hypothetical widens steadily from the mid-1990s,鈥 he says.
By 2024, global warming had reduced NSW economic output by an average 18.1%.
That is equivalent to $21,288 per person in lost annual economic output across the state.
鈥淭here is considerable uncertainty in the estimates across models, with losses between 4% at the low end and 33% at the upper end of current state output,鈥 Dr Neal says.
鈥淏ut even the lower-bound estimate of 4% represents meaningful loss in economic output each year.
鈥淲e don鈥檛 get to observe the world without anthropogenic warming 鈥撀燽ut the best guess from the data we have is that we would be meaningfully richer today if it didn鈥檛 exist.鈥
Media enquiries
For media enquiries and to arrange interviews, please contact聽Melissa Lyne:
罢别濒:听0415 514 328
贰尘补颈濒:听m.lyne@unsw.edu.au
Global exposures driving the damage
Traditionally, economic climate models only used local weather data. Dr Neal added global weather patterns and combined multiple models to build a fuller picture of how climate change affects the economy.
鈥淚ncluding global weather, not just local conditions, produces a closer fit with the observed economic growth data,鈥 Dr Neal says.
He says the analysis also highlights how globally interconnected climate risk has become.
Global temperature trends account for 17.6 percentage points of the estimated 18.1% loss in NSW economic output.
鈥淲hat happens overseas affects NSW because economies are deeply interconnected,鈥 Dr Neal says.
鈥淣SW does not trade with itself. It buys and sells goods across borders.
鈥淚f crops fail overseas, or ports shut during heatwaves, then prices shift, supply chains tighten 鈥撀燼nd businesses and consumers in NSW feel the effects.鈥
Strength in numbers
Dr Neal鈥檚 analysis combines three major economic models that use different methods to estimate how weather affects economic output.
One assumes economic productivity peaks at around 20掳C, with performance declining as temperatures move further from that level.
Another measures how unusual temperatures are compared with a long-term average, based on the idea that unexpected heat or cold is more economically disruptive.
This 鈥渆nsemble鈥 approach combines multiple models to try and produce a more reliable estimate than relying on any single model alone.
鈥淥ne key challenge we had was deciding when to start comparing against a counterfactual,鈥 he says.
鈥淲e only have data on NSW Gross Product from 1990, but if we started to run the modelling then, we would miss too much anthropogenic climate change.
鈥淲e had to project NSW鈥檚 GDP backwards to 1975 using data like global GDP, as well as population statistics before we could run the counterfactual.鈥
Dr Neal is now refining the approach to analyse historical climate costs around the world.
鈥淭here鈥檚 some additional work to do for a global analysis, particularly in expanding the suite of models for the ensemble and how we weight results across models, but the findings for NSW will likely change little.鈥
He says the results also align with a broader trend in research suggesting we have systematically underestimated the scale and cost of climate change.
鈥淓conomics helps policymakers weigh the costs of transition against the damage expected under different climate pathways,鈥 he says.
鈥淭here is growing concern that the major models underpinning climate policy have not fully captured the cascading risks now emerging.
鈥淚f we continue to make decisions based on underestimated climate costs, we鈥檙e short-changing ourselves and future generations.鈥
We don鈥檛 get to observe the world without anthropogenic warming 鈥 but the best guess from the data we have is that we would be meaningfully richer today if it didn鈥檛 exist.
Climate's cascading costs
While the models don鈥檛 examine how hotter or unusual weather hurts the economy, a growing body of research shows heat can slow brain functions and be a health risk.
91色情片 climate scientist Professor Lisa Alexander contributed to a that showed worker productivity drops by 2鈥3% for every degree above 20掳C.
She says extreme heat, which already poses severe health risks for 2.4 billion workers globally, is going to become a greater threat in the future.
鈥淭here are really so many ways heat can impact the body, and productivity, and have these have flow on effects.鈥
Some estimates suggest heat may have contributed to as much as $US1 trillion in lost income globally in 2024 alone.
鈥淎t each step in these systems, you add another layer of uncertainty, making it hard to get a full picture of the risk,鈥 she says.
鈥淏ut a certain degree of global warming is locked in, even if we stopped burning fossil fuels tomorrow, so we need to find ways to adapt.鈥
Professor Maggie Dong, a supply-chain expert at the 91色情片 Business School, says storms can rapidly create 鈥渁 domino effect鈥, disrupting business.
鈥淎 flood doesn鈥檛 only cause delays in flooded areas, it delays the whole logistics network,鈥 Prof. Dong says.
鈥淩erouting freight creates bottlenecks. Firms need to reallocate vehicles and labour at short notice. Goods arrive late or damaged.鈥
Prof. Dong is developing a way to measure how extreme weather disrupts logistics networks, with the hope of improving coordination and resilience.
鈥淲e鈥檙e learning new lessons about how important it is to identify and respond to supply-chain crises if we鈥檙e to build resilience into our financial system.鈥
Read more about this issue at .
Related stories
-
A real 鈥榠ntergenerational equity鈥 budget would address our unceasing environmental decline
-
91色情片 experts available to speak on the Iran conflict and its global impacts
-
Australia angles for greater insight on climate-economic blind spots
-
Some economists have severely underestimated financial hit from climate change